Korean Supreme Court Expands Scope of Regular Wages: Implications for Businesses
On December 19, 2024, the South Korean Supreme Court made a landmark ruling that conditional bonuses, such as regular bonuses tied to employment status or minimum workdays, must now be included as part of regular wages. This decision has sparked widespread concern across industries as it directly impacts labor costs, especially amid an already challenging business environment.
Background of the Supreme Court Decision
The Supreme Court’s en banc panel ruled in favor of employees in two major cases involving Hanwha Life Insurance and Hyundai Motor Company. In both cases, the court invalidated conditions that restricted bonus payments to certain employees, such as those actively employed on a specific date or who met a minimum number of workdays. The court found these conditions inconsistent with the principles governing regular wages.
This judgment overturns a precedent set in 2013 when the Supreme Court established three defining criteria for regular wages: regularity, uniformity, and fixedness. The latest ruling redefines "fixedness," broadening the scope of what constitutes regular wages.
Industrial and Economic Concerns
The inclusion of conditional bonuses as regular wages is expected to significantly increase labor costs for businesses. The Federation of Korean Industries (FKI) estimates that approximately 26.7% of South Korean companies will be affected, with additional labor costs projected at ₩6.8 trillion annually. Extended work, night shifts, holiday pay, and annual leave compensations tied to regular wages are also likely to rise.
Major economic organizations expressed concern:
The Korean Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KCCI): Highlighted fears of "chaos in industrial sites" and a compounded financial burden on companies due to the revised wage standards.
The Korea Employers Federation (KEF): Warned of potential lawsuits and negative impacts on employment stability.
The Korea Federation of Small and Medium Businesses: Pointed to the challenges faced by small businesses already struggling with high interest rates, inflation, and declining domestic demand. They anticipate heightened labor disputes and potential job losses in the sector.
Impact on Businesses
The decision affects companies differently:
Large Enterprises: Larger corporations, which often have more comprehensive payroll systems, may face steeper increases in labor costs due to higher existing bonus structures.
Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs): SMEs are particularly vulnerable, with limited financial resources to absorb sudden cost increases. This could exacerbate the wage gap between large corporations and smaller businesses.
Hyundai Motor Company: Already burdened by rising labor costs, the company is expected to face significant challenges in adjusting to the new wage system. Hyundai's employee compensation expenses have risen from ₩900 billion in 2020 to ₩1.2 trillion in 2023, reflecting a 13.5% wage hike last year alone.
HD Hyundai Heavy Industries: This company and its affiliates are relatively insulated from the ruling, having already adapted their wage structures following a prior Supreme Court decision in 2012.
Long-term Considerations
Experts argue that this ruling underscores the urgent need for wage system reform in South Korea. Traditionally based on seniority, South Korea's wage structure is increasingly seen as incompatible with modern labor dynamics. Calls for a transition to job-based pay systems are growing louder, emphasizing the importance of aligning wages with roles and performance rather than tenure.
Conclusion
While the Supreme Court's decision prioritizes worker rights and wage transparency, it introduces significant challenges for businesses navigating an uncertain global economic landscape. Companies must now reconsider their labor cost strategies, and policymakers need to support businesses in implementing sustainable wage structures. The ruling also serves as a wake-up call for South Korea to modernize its wage systems to balance fairness with economic viability.
This decision marks a turning point in South Korea's labor policies, reflecting an evolving balance between labor rights and corporate sustainability in one of Asia’s most dynamic economies.
Comments